What treatments are available? The ADHD.org.nz child of the week
|
The administering of medication in schools is a highly contencious issue. Some schools have refused to take responsibility for ensuring that a child takes or is given their medication. Recently (February 1999), however, lawyers from YouthLaw (Inc.) provided their legal opinion on this issue: "As recent controversy has largely surrounded the administration of the drug methylphenidate ("Ritalin") to allow for the management of Attention Deficit Disorder or Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in schools, we have specifically addressed issues relevant to these conditions in this opinion."
"Under section 21 (1) of the Human Rights Act, prohibited grounds of discrimination
include: "We consider that ADD/ADHD is a disability under the terms of section 21 (1). If drug treatment is considered necessary to allow students to participate fully in education despite their disorder, then the refusal to administer this treatment could have the effect of preventing them from having equal access to education, which is prohibited under section 57. Because of the operation of section 65, refusal to medicate students could be a breach of the Human Rights Act 1993." "Common Law Principles - A school has a legal duty of care for students at Common Law, and is responsible for minimising the risk of injury or harm to them. It may be that a refusal to administer medication puts a child or young person at risk of harm, or increase the likelihood that he or she will harm another student. A school could be legally liable for such harm if it could be shown to have resulted from a medical decision which a school was not properly qualified to make." "Therefore we suggest that if a school refuses to medicate children while they are in a school's care, this could be seen as a breach of common law duty to take responsibility for its students."
contact us This page was last modified 090800.
|